Education
is what survives when what has been learned has been forgotten. (B.F.
Skinner)
|
Guidelines
for understanding biblical texts
(and for
writing exegesis papers) |
|
Below
are some things you should consider in your study of the assigned passages
for discussion, as well as for your paper. These are suggested ways
for you to engage the biblical text. Their purpose is to encourage your
own critical thinking about, and interaction with, the biblical passage.
Your papers (and your comments
during discussions) will be evaluated not so much on the results or conclusions
you propose, but on how you have come to reach your
interpretations or conclusions. I'm interested in seeing in your papers (and comments
in class) the kinds of questions you posed of the text to extract meaning.
I'm also interested in seeing how aware you are of the assumptions you
bring to the text.
It is okay if your interpretation
or conclusions differ from mine or that of the textbook authors, other biblical
scholars, or other
students. In fact, this would be desirable and could be wonderful. Just make sure
you can explain or defend your interpretation using biblical texts and other evidence
(historical, archaeological, etc.). The important thing is for you to encounter
the biblical texts on your own, critically and imaginatively.
The suggestions below
will equip you to get started with exegesis and organize your thoughts
for writing your paper.
|
1. |
Address
basic
questions of the text. For example:
|
• |
Who,
what, when, where, why, how? |
|
• |
Who's talking? |
|
• |
Who's not talking? |
|
• |
What's there in
the passage? |
|
• |
What's not there? |
|
• |
What are the key
words, concepts, issues? |
|
|
2. |
Literary
(form-critical and stylistic) considerations:
|
• |
Read
the text aloud a number of times. |
|
• |
What
features mark the passage as a separate unit, if it is one at all? |
|
• |
Does it have a clear-cut
beginning and a recognizable ending? |
|
• |
Do you see an overall
structure? |
|
• |
How are the parts
of the passage related with each other? |
|
• |
What literary devices
or techniques do you observe in the passage (e.g., repetition, use of imagery,
play on words, recurrent motifs)? |
|
• |
What kind of effect
do they create? |
|
• |
Is there any movement
toward a climactic point? |
|
• |
Any resolution of
tension? |
|
• |
Is there a central
point, statement, verse, etc.? |
|
|
3. |
Contextual
(redactional) factors:
|
• |
How
is the passage related to what comes immediately before and after it? |
|
• |
How does the literary
unit function within its larger context? |
|
• |
How is it related
to the larger context in terms of vocabulary, themes, etc.? |
|
• |
Does the passage
seem to have any previous history before it was appropriated into the present
context? |
|
• |
What are the hints
of a previous history or tradition (e.g., dissonance or inconsistencies,
rough transitions or seams, literary peculiarities, theological overtones
from the past)? How would you explain them? |
|
• |
Is there any tension
or confusion in the text due to that process of incorporation? |
|
• |
What
does the literary unit contribute to its present context? |
|
|
4. |
Life
situation (Sitz im Leben) questions:
|
• |
What
kind of historical or social setting does the passage reflect or presuppose? |
|
• |
Does it reflect
a concrete situation in the life of a person or a group of people? |
|
• |
Can you think of
any particular context in which the passage would function (e.g., treaty,
baptism)? |
|
• |
Does it presuppose
a cultic situation in life (i.e., religious practices)? |
|
• |
What is at issue
for the author of the passage? For the intended audience? |
|
• |
Does
the passage, when understood in its historical setting, transcend its time
so that it speaks to distant ages including our own? |
|
• |
Do you see any realities
or problems of human existence probed in the text? |
|
|
5. |
Canonical
considerations:
|
• |
How
is the passage related to the rest of the Old Testament or New Testament
or both? |
|
• |
Are there other
biblical passages that resonate or clash with the passage? |
|
|
NB Focus on the biblical
text with the questions above as initial guides to understanding
the passage. Use
1) the NOAB annotations, 2) the textbook(s),
and 3)
critical commentaries and reference
materials in the library
to illuminate,
test, and refine your reading, but only after you have wrestled
with the passage on your own for a while. |
|
For
helpful tips go to: English
Matters.
Also try this
(not everything applies, but most of it is very helpful). |
|